|
Page 3 of 3
The Widening Zone Number Three of Complexity, Uncertainty and Change
Neighboring the simple and rational zone number one is zone number
two, complicated but not excessively complex. In this zone further to
the upper left is where politics and coalition building occurs because
there are broad differences about "how to get there" rather than the
expected outcome. To the bottom right in zone number two
cause-and-effect linkages are not known or reliable, so this is where
shared vision and mission of a future state beats preset project
planning. The executive teams' ability to inspire employees and
continual sense-and-respond to react are key.
My belief as to why there is an accelerating interest in performance
management is an expanding gulf of zone number three, the zone of
complexity, uncertainty and change. This is the gathering storm
location threatening all organizations. It borders near the chaos and
anarchy zone. In zone number three's upper left region unsubstantiated
agenda building overrides fact-based decision-making. In the lower
right region blind muddling by the group overrides visioning,
inspiration and good risk management. As markets become more intensely
competitive, managers are faced with more and more high-stakes
decisions that are increasingly populating zone number three. As a
result, success in managing zone number three requires both making the
right decision in the first place and then executing on that chosen
path.
The collective suite of integrated methodologies that comprise
performance management (e.g., strategy mapping, scorecards, customer
value management, risk management, etc.) provides solutions for zone
number three. Performance management shifts problems and
decision-making in zone number three toward the direction of zone
number one - making them simpler problems. Here is how:
- A shift in emphasis toward applying analytics of all flavors,
including predictive analytics with what-if and economic trade-off
scenarios, bolsters proactive decision-making.
- Gathering all information onto an enterprise-wide and common
information platform with scalable real-time information replaces
disparate and disconnected data sources.
- Cross-functional communication and collaboration amongst employees
and automated rule-based decisions replace self-serving silo and bunker
mentality.
- The work processes, priorities, initiatives and target-setting of
managers and employee teams are aligned with the strategic intent of
the executive team. These replace pet projects, minimal (or
nonexistent) accountability, and internally competing performance
metrics that are suboptimal and degrade maximizing stakeholder needs -
such as for shareholders or customers.
- Economic measures of customer profitability and potential customer
value are made visible to support differentiated service levels, offers
or deals to achieve maximum profit yield from the sales and marketing
budget.
- The vital few measures that matter (KPIs) are focused on rather
than the trivial many (PIs) to distinguish the signal from the noise.
- Exception reporting, alert messaging, and at-a-glance visual
reporting improves traction and accelerates speed in the strategic
direction set (and constantly and necessarily reset) by the executive
team.
Organizations need top-down guidance with bottom-up execution. Truly
effective performance management, not simply the narrow financial view
of better budgeting and control, shifts decisions that are currently
waffling in zone number three into zones two and one - and away from
the dreaded zone number four of chaos and anarchy. Zone number three of
complexity is expanding due to the forces described earlier, and
effective performance management brings rationale thinking to convert
once perceived complicated problems (i.e., zone number two) into simple
ones (zone number two).
Understanding what performance management does is more important than trying to define what it is.
References:
- Gartner. "Bank CEOs Rate Business & Technology Concerns." 2004. www.gartner.com.
- Stacey, Ralph D. Complexity and Creativity in Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc., 1996.
| |
Column published in DMReview.com
December 1, 2006 |
No one has commented on this article.
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 Next > End >> |